Monroe Construction Accident Attorney

Monroe construction accident attorneys at Morris & Dewett -- workers comp exclusive remedy, third-party claims, the two-year filing deadline, and how injured workers recover.

Let Our Experience Work for You

  • $409 MillionRecord Verdict
  • 122Cases Over $1 Million
  • $1 Billion+Recovered for Clients
  • No FeeUnless We Win
  • Trial ReadyNot a Settlement Mill

*results may vary, outcome not guaranteed

Trey Morris and Justin Dewett

Put Your Case in Capable Hands for Free

We respond in minutes, 24/7

Call Us Direct: (318) 221-1508
Thanks, , your case review is underway.

A member of our team will contact you, usually within minutes during business hours. Have any photos, medical records, or insurance letters handy if you can; they help, but none are required.

Your review is free, there is no obligation, and everything you share is confidential.

Or Call Us Now: 24/7
2,498+ Trust is Earned Serving Monroe 1831 N Trenton St, Ste 2, Ruston, LA 71270 318-702-8648

A Monroe construction accident can involve multiple contractors, federal safety regulations, and workers compensation rules that cut off certain claims. Identifying who is actually responsible is rarely the obvious answer.

Morris & Dewett has handled construction accident and injury cases across northeast Louisiana for over 25 years.

Construction Site Accidents in Monroe and Ouachita Parish

Monroe construction sites include the I-20 commercial corridor, Ouachita River development, and the Lumen Technologies campus. The sector is growing. Megaprojects in adjacent Richland Parish are projected to peak at 20,500 construction workers by late 2026, according to Better Louisiana. A Meta AI data center and an Entergy power facility are among the drivers. More workers on more job sites means more exposure to serious injury.

Fatal Four

OSHA’s term for the four accident types that cause the most construction fatalities: falls, struck-by incidents, caught-in/between accidents, and electrocutions. Together they account for more than half of all construction worker deaths in the U.S.

Fatal Four

OSHA identifies the Fatal Four as the dominant cause of construction fatalities: falls, struck-by incidents, caught-in/between accidents, and electrocutions. Federal standards under 29 C.F.R. Part 1926 address each category directly. Louisiana has no state OSHA plan for private-sector workers, so those federal standards apply on every Monroe job site without modification.

OSHA violations matter in civil cases. Under La. C.C. Art. 2315, a person who causes damage through negligence is liable for that damage. When a contractor violates a specific OSHA standard, that violation is admissible as evidence of negligence in a Louisiana civil court.

Serving Monroe

Served from our Ruston office -- serving all of Ouachita Parish.

1831 N Trenton St, Ste 2
Ruston, LA 71270

318-702-8648

Open 24/7 for injured Monroe residents

Get directions →

Workers Compensation: Exclusive Remedy and Its Limits

exclusive remedy

The legal rule that bars an injured worker from suing their direct employer in civil court when workers compensation coverage applies. The worker receives guaranteed benefits without proving fault, but gives up the right to a jury trial against the employer.

Louisiana workers compensation under La. R.S. 23:1032 is the exclusive remedy against a direct employer. This means you cannot sue your employer in civil court for pain and suffering or punitive damages if workers compensation applies. In exchange, you receive benefits without proving fault.

Benefits include medical treatment and wage replacement at two-thirds of your pre-injury average weekly wage. You do not need to show your employer did anything wrong. The system pays regardless of fault, subject to its own requirements.

borrowed servant doctrine

A Louisiana legal principle under La. R.S. 23:1031(C) that treats a worker lent by one employer to another as the employee of the borrowing employer for workers compensation purposes. This can affect which insurer must pay and which parties are shielded from civil claims.

statutory employer doctrine

A Louisiana doctrine that treats a general contractor as the employer of a subcontractor’s workers for workers compensation purposes, which can shield the GC from tort liability but also means the GC’s insurer may owe workers comp benefits.

The borrowed servant doctrine under La. R.S. 23:1031(C) adds complexity to multi-contractor job sites. If your employer placed you to work under another contractor’s supervision, that borrowing contractor may be treated as your statutory employer. This directly affects which insurer must cover your claim and which parties may be shielded from civil suits. The statutory employer doctrine similarly allows general contractors to invoke workers comp exclusivity as a defense to civil claims by subcontractors’ employees.

Whether the exclusive remedy defense applies and who qualifies as your statutory employer are questions a Monroe workers compensation attorney resolves on the facts of the work arrangement. These doctrines are frequently litigated in Louisiana construction cases, and the answer is not always what the GC or their insurer claims it to be.

Third-Party Claims Against Contractors, Subcontractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Workers compensation covers only your direct employer and, in some situations, the statutory employer above them. It does not bar every civil claim. Parties who are not your employer can still be sued in civil court, and construction accident cases regularly involve multiple defendants.

General contractors who retain control over jobsite safety face direct negligence claims under Louisiana law even when the injured worker is employed by a subcontractor. If the GC conducted safety inspections, enforced safety rules, or directed work methods on the site, that control can support liability under La. C.C. Art. 2315.

Property owners face separate liability under La. C.C. Arts. 2317 and 2322. Article 2317 imposes liability for damage caused by things in a person’s custody. Article 2322 specifically addresses liability for ruin of a building or defects in construction. Property owners who fail to correct known hazardous conditions or who failed to disclose them to contractors are exposed to civil claims.

Louisiana Products Liability Act

La. R.S. 9:2800.52 et seq. The Louisiana statute governing claims against product manufacturers. To recover, the injured person must prove the product was unreasonably dangerous in its design, construction, or warnings.

Equipment manufacturers face claims under the Louisiana Products Liability Act at La. R.S. 9:2800.52. Unreasonably dangerous design, defective construction, or inadequate warnings each support a separate theory of recovery. Equipment that fails unexpectedly, tools that lack safety guards, and scaffolding components that collapse without warning are all potential product liability cases.

workers compensation lien

The right of a workers compensation insurer to be reimbursed from any third-party civil settlement or judgment for benefits it has already paid to the injured worker. Louisiana law requires the lien to be satisfied before the worker keeps the remainder.

If you were placed through a staffing agency, both the agency and the host employer may face liability under borrowed servant analysis. Courts examine who directed your work, who had the right to discharge you, and who supplied the tools you used. These facts determine which entities can be reached through civil claims. Any third-party recovery must also address the workers compensation lien. The insurer that paid your workers comp benefits will assert a claim against your civil recovery. Experienced attorneys structure third-party settlements to minimize what the insurer recaptures.

Representative Results

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes; each case is decided on its own facts. See our full case results.

The Fatal Four: What Each Accident Category Means for Your Claim

Falls remain the leading cause of construction fatalities in the United States. OSHA 29 C.F.R. SS 1926.502 requires fall protection systems any time a worker is six feet or more above a lower level. Guardrails, personal fall arrest systems, or covers over floor openings are all required. An employer who fails to provide any of these where required has violated a specific federal standard. That violation is admissible as negligence evidence in a Louisiana civil court.

Struck-by incidents involve objects, vehicles, or equipment moving near workers without adequate controls. OSHA 29 C.F.R. SS 1926.600 governs equipment operations near workers. Hard hat exclusion zones, spotter requirements, and equipment travel path restrictions are all part of the standard. Monroe’s road-adjacent construction zones on the I-20 corridor and Ouachita River development sites increase struck-by exposure from passing traffic and heavy equipment operating near workers simultaneously.

Caught-in/between accidents include machinery entanglement and trench cave-ins. OSHA 29 C.F.R. SS 1926.652 requires trench shoring or sloping any time excavation depth exceeds five feet. Unguarded rotating machinery parts, cave-ins on excavation projects, and compressed equipment are all covered. Violations of these specific standards are strong evidence of negligence.

Electrocution results from unguarded electrical hazards, unlocated buried lines, or failure to maintain clearance from overhead power lines. OSHA 29 C.F.R. SS 1926.400 sets electrical safety requirements for construction, including lockout/tagout procedures and required utility locating before any excavation. Active construction in Monroe involves utility-dense corridors where underground line identification failures create serious electrocution exposure.

OSHA records are available under the Freedom of Information Act after an investigation closes. These records can show whether the site was cited, what violations were found, and what corrective actions were ordered.

Your Monroe Injury Attorneys

Founding partners Trey Morris and Justin Dewett lead every Monroe injury case Morris & Dewett takes.

Filing Deadlines and Preserving Evidence After a Monroe Construction Accident

prescriptive period

Louisiana’s term for the statute of limitations. The legal deadline to file a lawsuit. Missing this deadline means losing the right to recover, regardless of the merits of the claim.

The prescriptive period for personal injury in Louisiana is two years from the date of injury under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1 (Act 423 of 2024). This applies to accidents on or after July 1, 2024. If your accident occurred before that date, the old one-year period may apply. Workers compensation claims have a longer prescriptive period of three years from the date of injury or last medical treatment under La. R.S. 23:1209.

Evidence disappears quickly on construction sites. Job sites are cleaned up and repurposed. Camera footage is overwritten on short retention cycles. Equipment inspection logs are destroyed in ordinary records purges. Subcontractor safety meeting minutes and tool-box talk documentation rarely survive more than a few months without a preservation demand.

Pre-suit evidence preservation demands should go to every responsible party and their insurers as soon as you retain counsel. These demands require recipients to halt their ordinary destruction schedules for all documents, records, video, and equipment related to your accident. Failure to preserve after receiving a demand can result in court sanctions and adverse inference instructions against the party that destroyed evidence.

Comparative Fault

A legal rule under La. C.C. Art. 2323 that reduces your recovery by your percentage of fault. As of January 1, 2026, if you are 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing. If you are 50% or less at fault, your damages are reduced by your fault percentage.

Personal injury and third-party construction claims for Ouachita Parish residents are filed in the 4th Judicial District Court at 300 St. John St., Monroe. Louisiana’s Comparative Fault rule under La. C.C. Art. 2323 took effect January 1, 2026. Defense attorneys in construction cases regularly attempt to argue that the injured worker contributed to their own injury. This is a calculated strategy to push your fault percentage above 50%. Your attorney’s response to this argument, and their method for documenting the job site’s safety failures, determines how much of that effort succeeds.

Morris & Dewett sends preservation demands to all identified parties before any formal negotiations begin.

What clients say

  • ★★★★★

    I hired Morris and Dewett back in November of 2025.

    They helped me get through my hard times of being off work, stress, and worry. Anytime I had a question I could call and they always had an answer. Very nice and professtional people. Thank you Morris and Dewett for making this an easy process for me and my family.

    jonathan ChandlerShreveport Office · Jun. 27, 2026
  • ★★★★★

    Morris and Dewett and their team of attorneys and staff go above and beyond.

    They always were there to support me and answer all my questions after a shoulder injury that included multiple surgeries. They are caring and compassionate and that goes a long way! Highly recommended!

    Carolyn LawsonMinden Office · Jun. 26, 2026
  • ★★★★★

    Thanks Morris and Dewett for the excellent work you have done on my behalf.

    I want to personally thank Sarah for her kindness.

    Lydell ScottCovington Office · Jun. 18, 2026
  • ★★★★★

    Morris & Dewett does things the right way!

    They put their clients first in measurable and impactful ways.

    Brooke BirkeyRuston Office · Jun. 11, 2026
  • ★★★★★

    First time being injured and needing a lawyer they where very helpful.

    They answered my questions Id have very well. Highly recommend them.

    Sarah StarlingLake Charles Office · Jun. 5, 2026
  • ★★★★★

    Wonderful experience with Morris and DeWitt, everyone was articulate and punctual, and open to all my questions about the process.

    My case couldn't have been handled by a better team! Caity Nerren, Jessica Christian, and Meghan Nolen were all fantastic and helped every step of the way. Thanks again for all of your hard work.

    Taylor ThorneShreveport Office · Jun. 20, 2026

Reviews reflect individual client experiences. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

What Does Louisiana Law Allow You to Recover in a Construction Accident Case?

In a third-party civil claim, Louisiana law allows recovery for past and future medical expenses, lost wages, loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium for spouses. These are your actual damages, calculated by what happened and what the injury will cost you over time.

Medical expense recovery changed under La. R.S. 9:2800.27, which took effect as part of the 2024 tort reform. You can recover only the amounts actually paid or owed for medical treatment, not the amounts originally billed. Hospitals bill significantly more than insurers actually pay. This distinction affects how economic damages are presented to a jury and must be handled carefully by your attorney.

Loss of Earning Capacity

The difference between what you could have earned over your working lifetime before the injury and what you can earn now. Calculated using vocational rehabilitation analysis and economic testimony. It is a separate damage category from lost past wages.

Loss of Earning Capacity is calculated using vocational rehabilitation analysis and economic expert testimony. For injured construction workers, especially those in physically demanding trades, the difference between pre-injury and post-injury earning potential can represent decades of income.

Non-economic damages, including pain and suffering, are not capped in Louisiana personal injury cases. The $500,000 cap that applies to medical malpractice claims does not apply to construction accidents. If your injuries are severe, non-economic damages can represent a substantial portion of total recovery.

Comparative fault reduces recovery proportionally. If a jury assigns you 30% fault on a $500,000 case, you receive $350,000. If the jury finds you 51% at fault, you receive nothing. The allocation of fault between defendants, and between you and the defendants, is central to the litigation strategy in every construction case.

If your injuries require emergency care in Monroe, St. Francis Medical Center at 2700 Jackson Ave. and Glenwood Regional Medical Center at 503 McMillan Rd. in West Monroe are the primary trauma facilities serving Ouachita Parish. Documentation of your initial treatment and all follow-up care becomes the foundation of your medical damages calculation.

A vocational rehabilitation expert and an economist are both required for a complete damages presentation of loss of earning capacity for construction workers whose injuries prevent a return to physical trades. Morris & Dewett works with both disciplines on serious construction injury cases.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does workers compensation prevent me from suing after a construction accident in Louisiana?
Workers compensation under La. R.S. 23:1032 bars civil tort claims only against your direct employer and, in some situations, the statutory employer above them. It does not prevent you from suing general contractors, other subcontractors, property owners, or equipment manufacturers who contributed to your accident. Many construction accident cases involve both a workers comp claim against the employer and a civil lawsuit against one or more third parties. The exclusive remedy defense applies narrowly, and its scope is frequently contested.
What is the deadline to file a construction accident lawsuit in Louisiana?
For accidents that occurred on or after July 1, 2024, you have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1 (Act 423 of 2024). Workers compensation claims have a separate prescriptive period of three years from the date of injury or last medical treatment under La. R.S. 23:1209. If your accident occurred before July 1, 2024, the old one-year personal injury prescriptive period may apply. Missing either deadline ends your right to recover.
What is the borrowed servant doctrine and how does it affect my construction accident claim?
Under La. R.S. 23:1031(C), the borrowed servant doctrine can treat a worker lent to another employer as the employee of the borrowing employer for workers compensation purposes. On Monroe construction sites, this often comes up when a subcontractor places workers under a general contractor's daily supervision. Louisiana courts apply a multi-factor test examining who directed the work, who had the right to discharge the worker, who supplied the tools, and how long the arrangement lasted. Which entity qualifies as the borrowing employer determines which insurer must pay and which parties are shielded from civil claims.
Can I sue the general contractor if I was employed by a subcontractor?
Yes, in most circumstances. The general contractor's potential protection under the statutory employer doctrine applies only when the GC and the injured worker's employer had a specific written contract making the GC responsible as a statutory employer under La. R.S. 23:1061. Even where that doctrine applies, a GC who retained actual control over jobsite safety can face civil negligence claims under La. C.C. Art. 2315. Courts examine who enforced safety rules, who conducted safety inspections, and who directed work methods. General contractors who micro-managed safety cannot use the statutory employer doctrine as a complete shield.
How do OSHA violations help a construction accident case in Louisiana?
OSHA is a federal regulatory agency that sets workplace safety standards for construction sites. When an employer or contractor violates a specific OSHA standard, that violation is admissible in a Louisiana civil case as evidence of negligence under La. C.C. Art. 2315. Courts have recognized that OSHA standards define the minimum safe practice for a given activity. Violation of that standard supports a finding that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. OSHA investigation records are obtainable under the Freedom of Information Act after a site investigation closes and can be subpoenaed in litigation.
What is a workers compensation lien and does it reduce my recovery?
When your workers comp insurer pays your medical bills and wage replacement benefits, it acquires a lien under Louisiana law against any civil recovery you obtain from a third party. If you recover $300,000 from a third-party defendant and your insurer paid $80,000 in benefits, the insurer can recover up to $80,000 from your civil recovery. Louisiana law provides mechanisms to reduce the lien amount under certain circumstances, including the lien holder's proportional share of attorney fees and costs. Your attorney should negotiate the lien reduction as part of structuring your overall recovery, not after the fact.
What if I was an independent contractor, not an employee, when I was injured?
Independent contractors are not covered by workers compensation under Louisiana law, which means they are not subject to the exclusive remedy rule. An independent contractor can file a civil negligence claim directly against the property owner, general contractor, or other responsible parties without going through workers comp first. However, Louisiana courts look at the economic reality of the work relationship, not just how the parties labeled it. If you were working under the direction and control of another party who supplied your tools and set your schedule, you may have been misclassified as an independent contractor. An attorney reviewing your situation will examine the actual working relationship, not the label on the contract.

Last updated June 5, 2026