Morris & Dewett has handled truck accident claims for 25 years.
Federal Minimum Insurance Requirements by Cargo Type
FMCSA
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. The federal agency that regulates commercial vehicles, sets safety standards, and enforces trucking rules including hours of service, vehicle inspections, and driver qualifications.
The FMCSA sets mandatory minimum liability insurance for every interstate motor carrier under 49 CFR Part 387. The minimums depend on what the truck carries and how much it weighs.
GVWR
Gross Vehicle Weight Rating. The maximum allowable total weight of a vehicle including cargo, passengers, and fuel. Vehicles over 10,000 lbs GVWR are classified as commercial.
The federal tiers work like this. Carriers operating vehicles under 10,001 lbs GVWR hauling non-hazardous property must carry at least $300,000 in liability coverage. For-hire carriers with vehicles at 10,001 lbs GVWR or above hauling non-hazardous freight must carry $750,000. Carriers transporting oil must carry $1,000,000. Carriers hauling hazardous substances as defined under 49 CFR 172.101 must carry $5,000,000.
These are minimums, not caps on liability. Many major carriers voluntarily carry $1 million to $5 million in primary coverage regardless of cargo type. They do this because their risk managers know the federal minimum is not enough to cover a serious accident.
Every interstate motor carrier must also file a BMC-91 or BMC-91X form with the FMCSA as proof of insurance. This filing is a condition of operating authority. If a carrier’s insurance lapses, the FMCSA can revoke its authority to operate. You can verify any carrier’s insurance status through the FMCSA’s SAFER system.
The difference between primary liability insurance and excess or umbrella policies matters for your claim. Primary coverage pays first. Excess coverage kicks in after the primary limits are exhausted. A carrier might carry $750,000 in primary liability and $2 million in umbrella coverage, giving a total of $2.75 million in available insurance.
Owner-operators and fleet carriers handle insurance differently. An owner-operator running under their own operating authority must carry their own policy meeting FMCSA minimums. An owner-operator leased onto a motor carrier is typically covered by the carrier’s policy. This distinction changes who you make the claim against and which insurer responds.
Morris & Dewett verifies insurance coverage for every truck accident case within the first 48 hours. We pull the carrier’s FMCSA filing, confirm the policy is active, and identify all coverage layers before the first demand goes out.
Louisiana State Insurance Requirements for Commercial Vehicles
Louisiana requires all motor vehicles to carry minimum liability insurance under La. R.S. 32:900. The state minimums for personal vehicles are $15,000 per person and $30,000 per accident for bodily injury, plus $25,000 for property damage. These are among the lowest in the country.
Commercial vehicles operating exclusively within Louisiana (intrastate) must meet at least the state minimums. However, federal FMCSA minimums preempt for any carrier that crosses state lines. Most commercial trucks on Louisiana highways are interstate carriers subject to the federal requirements.
UM/UIM
Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist coverage. A provision in your own auto insurance policy that pays you when the at-fault driver has no insurance (UM) or not enough insurance (UIM) to cover your damages. Louisiana law requires insurers to offer it, and it can stack across multiple vehicles on your policy.
Louisiana law also requires every auto insurer to offer UM/UIM coverage under La. R.S. 22:1295. This matters because trucking companies routinely reject UM/UIM on their commercial policies. The coverage they reject on their end could be the coverage that saves your claim on yours.
The gap between Louisiana’s personal auto minimums ($15,000) and the federal truck minimums ($750,000) reflects a basic reality. An 80,000-pound commercial truck causes damage at a scale that a passenger car does not. The federal government recognized this decades ago. Louisiana’s personal auto minimums have not kept pace with the same logic.
Beyond liability insurance, commercial operations involve separate coverage types. Cargo insurance protects the freight being transported. Non-owned trailer liability applies when a carrier hauls a trailer it does not own. Neither of these covers your injuries directly, but they matter in the overall claim picture because they reveal the carrier’s insurance structure.
Louisiana’s petrochemical corridor between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, and the Lake Charles industrial district, concentrate hazmat carriers subject to the $5,000,000 minimum. If your accident involved a tanker or chemical hauler on I-10 or I-210, the insurance picture is likely larger than a standard freight accident. The insurance layers and regulatory requirements for hazmat carriers are different from those for standard freight accidents.
Why Federal Minimums Are Often Inadequate for Catastrophic Injuries
The $750,000 federal minimum for non-hazardous freight carriers has not changed since 1985. In 1985, a hospital stay cost a fraction of what it costs today. The minimum was set when medical inflation was a different conversation.
The FMCSA published an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2014 to evaluate increasing the minimums. The agency received thousands of comments. It never finalized a rule. The $750,000 minimum stands.
Catastrophic truck accident injuries tell the story of why this matters. A traumatic brain injury requiring lifetime cognitive rehabilitation can exceed $750,000 in the first two years alone. Spinal cord injuries resulting in paraplegia generate lifetime care costs measured in millions. Severe burns requiring skin grafts and long-term wound care reach similar levels. The federal minimum was never designed to cover these outcomes. It was designed to ensure some coverage existed.
judgment-proof
A party that has no assets that can be seized to satisfy a court judgment. A judgment-proof trucking company owes money on paper but has nothing to collect.
When the policy limit is insufficient, your attorney’s job changes. The carrier’s assets become the target. Commercial trucks, real property, accounts receivable, and other business assets can be pursued. But many small carriers are judgment-proof. They own leased trucks, rent their terminal space, and hold minimal cash reserves. A judgment against them is worth the paper it is printed on.
Multiple claimants from a single accident create an additional problem. When three vehicles are hit and all occupants are injured, everyone competes for the same policy limit. The insurer may file an interpleader action, depositing the policy limit with the court and letting the claimants sort it out. Your share of a $750,000 limit split among five claimants is not $750,000.
Some large carriers self-insure under FMCSA authority. They must demonstrate financial capacity to cover claims without a traditional insurance policy. Pursuing a claim against a self-insured carrier differs from filing against an insurance policy. Morris & Dewett has handled claims against self-insured carriers and knows the discovery mechanisms required to reach those funds.
Most mid-size and large carriers carry excess or umbrella policies stacking $2 million to $10 million above the primary minimum. Identifying these layers early is critical. Your attorney should request the complete insurance disclosure, including all excess and umbrella policies, during the first round of discovery.
What the MCS-90 Endorsement Means for Your Claim
MCS-90
A federal endorsement required on every interstate motor carrier’s liability insurance policy. It guarantees the insurer will pay bodily injury and property damage claims from the public regardless of policy exclusions or coverage denials. The insurer can then seek reimbursement from the carrier.
The MCS-90 endorsement is a federal requirement on every interstate motor carrier liability policy. It exists to protect you, not the trucking company.
Here is what the MCS-90 does. If the carrier’s insurer attempts to deny your claim based on a policy exclusion, the MCS-90 overrides that denial. The insurer must pay the claim to the injured member of the public. The insurer then has the right to seek reimbursement from the carrier. This is a public protection mechanism written into federal law.
The MCS-90 has limits. It only applies to accidents involving the transportation of property in interstate commerce. It does not cover intrastate-only operations. Several federal circuits have held it does not apply to deadhead (unladen) movements, though this area of law is contested. It does not apply to passenger carriers.
The practical value of the MCS-90 shows up when the trucking company tries to escape coverage. An insurer might argue the driver was not authorized, or the truck was being used outside the scope of the policy. Without the MCS-90, those arguments could leave you with no insurance to pursue. With it, the insurer pays regardless and takes up the coverage dispute with the carrier separately.
When a trucking company’s insurer sends a denial letter, the MCS-90 may override that denial. Morris & Dewett treats every truck accident insurer denial as a potential MCS-90 issue and evaluates federal endorsement applicability before accepting any coverage position at face value.
Louisiana’s Direct Action Statute and Truck Insurance Claims
Louisiana was historically one of the few states allowing injured parties to sue an insurer directly. Under La. R.S. 22:1269, you could name the trucking company’s insurance carrier as a defendant in your lawsuit. This was the direct action statute.
That changed on August 1, 2024. The Louisiana Legislature significantly limited the direct action statute as part of the 2024 tort reform package. Insurers generally cannot be named as defendants in Louisiana state court except in specific circumstances.
Three exceptions survive. You can still bring a direct action if the insured carrier is insolvent, if the insurance policy itself provides for direct action, or if the insured is a nonresident of Louisiana. Outside these exceptions, the carrier and its driver remain the named defendants. The insurer’s obligation to defend and indemnify is enforced through the policy, not through direct action.
This changes how truck accident claims are structured in Louisiana. Before August 2024, having the insurer at the table as a named defendant created certain strategic advantages in discovery and settlement. Now, the insurer operates behind the carrier. The practical effect on your recovery is minimal if your attorney knows how to work within the new framework. The insurer still pays the claim. The route to that payment is different.
The 2024 direct action reform changed the litigation strategy for truck accident cases in Louisiana. Morris & Dewett restructured our truck accident litigation approach before the August 2024 effective date.
How Insurance Coverage Affects Your Truck Accident Claim Strategy
Available insurance coverage determines the entire strategy for a truck accident claim. Primary liability coverage comes first. Excess or umbrella policies stack on top. Motor cargo coverage protects the freight. General liability coverage may apply if the accident involved loading or unloading operations. Auto liability coverage attaches to the specific vehicle.
Identifying every applicable policy is the first task. Your attorney obtains the complete insurance disclosure through formal discovery under La. C.C.P. Art. 1422. The carrier is required to produce every policy that may provide coverage for the accident. This includes policies held by the carrier, the broker, and the shipper.
When multiple policies apply to the same accident, the concept of stacking becomes relevant. The carrier’s policy, the freight broker’s policy, and the shipper’s general liability policy may all provide coverage. Each policy has its own limits, exclusions, and conditions. Your attorney’s job is to identify every dollar of available coverage.
Policy limits shape settlement strategy. A case with $5 million in available coverage settles differently than a case with $750,000. Knowing the coverage ceiling early determines whether your attorney pursues aggressive litigation toward a verdict or negotiates within the policy structure.
Carrier insurers assign specialized heavy truck adjusters within hours of a crash. These are not the same adjusters who handle fender benders. They arrive at the scene, photograph everything, interview witnesses, and begin building the carrier’s defense before you have retained an attorney. This is why timing matters.
The full insurance disclosure must be obtained early in a truck case; waiting until discovery can be too late. Morris & Dewett requests insurance information within the first week and follows up with formal discovery requests if the carrier does not produce voluntarily.
Spoliation
The destruction or alteration of evidence after a party has notice of pending litigation. Courts can instruct juries to assume the destroyed evidence was unfavorable to the party that destroyed it.
Preservation Letter
A formal legal demand sent to the trucking company requiring them to preserve all evidence related to the crash. Stops the carrier from overwriting black box data or destroying driver logs on their normal retention schedule.
Spoliation risk is real in truck accident cases. Insurer-retained defense counsel may advise the carrier on evidence preservation. Preservation Letter demands must go to both the carrier and the insurer. Morris & Dewett sends preservation demands within 24 hours of engagement. We address them to the carrier, the carrier’s insurer, the broker, and any other party with access to evidence. Bobtail truck accidents present unique insurance coverage questions because the truck may be operating outside the carrier’s commercial policy.
What Happens When the Trucking Company Is Underinsured
Small carriers carrying only the federal minimum face a math problem when a serious accident happens. A $750,000 policy against a multi-million dollar claim leaves a gap that has to be filled from somewhere.
Your own auto insurance is the first place to look. Louisiana law under La. R.S. 22:1295 provides UM/UIM coverage that applies when the at-fault driver’s insurance is insufficient. If you carry $100,000 in UIM coverage and the truck’s policy only covers $750,000 of your $850,000 claim, your UIM policy covers the remaining $100,000.
UM/UIM coverage in Louisiana can be stacked per vehicle on your policy unless you signed a written rejection of stacking. If you have three vehicles on your policy with $100,000 in UIM coverage each and did not reject stacking, you have $300,000 in available UIM coverage. Many people do not know this until they need it.
Beyond your own insurance, an underinsured carrier’s assets are fair targets. Commercial trucks, real property, accounts receivable, and equipment can be pursued to satisfy a judgment. But the corporate structure of many small carriers limits what is available. A single-truck LLC with leased equipment and rented yard space may have no collectible assets.
Piercing the corporate veil is an option when the carrier entity is undercapitalized or is the alter ego of the owner. If the owner commingled personal and business funds, failed to maintain corporate formalities, or used the LLC specifically to avoid liability, a court can hold the owner personally liable.
negligent entrustment
A legal theory holding a vehicle owner or employer liable for knowingly allowing an unqualified, incompetent, or reckless person to operate a vehicle. Applies when the company knew or should have known about the driver’s unfitness.
Freight broker liability is another avenue. Under the negligent entrustment doctrine and negligent selection theories, the broker that hired an underinsured or unsafe carrier may be independently liable. Shipper liability applies when the shipper loaded the cargo improperly or selected a carrier it knew or should have known was underinsured. Oversize load accidents often involve shipper liability when the load itself contributed to the crash.
Underinsured carrier cases require identifying every potential source of recovery before the first demand letter goes out. Morris & Dewett maps the complete insurance and asset picture for every truck accident case. We identify the carrier’s policy, excess layers, broker coverage, shipper coverage, and the client’s own UM/UIM before we develop the claim strategy.
Louisiana Tort Reform Changes That Affect Truck Insurance Claims
Louisiana’s tort reform changes from 2024 through 2026 affect every truck accident insurance claim.
Comparative Fault
A legal rule that reduces your recovery by your percentage of fault. In Louisiana, if you are 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing. If you are 50% or less at fault, your damages are reduced proportionally.
Comparative Fault is the biggest change. Effective January 1, 2026, Louisiana switched from pure comparative fault to a modified 51% bar under La. C.C. Art. 2323. If you are 51% or more at fault, you recover nothing. At 50% fault, you can still recover, reduced by half. Insurance adjusters in truck cases build their entire strategy around pushing your fault percentage above that threshold.
Prescriptive Period
Louisiana’s term for statute of limitations. The legal deadline to file a lawsuit. For personal injury, it is two years from the date of injury under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1 (effective July 1, 2024).
The Prescriptive Period for personal injury claims is two years from the date of injury under La. C.C. Art. 3493.1, effective July 1, 2024. If your injury occurred before that date, the old one-year period applies. Missing this deadline eliminates your claim entirely. No exceptions.
The collateral source rule changed on January 1, 2026 under La. R.S. 9:2800.27. Your recovery for medical expenses is now limited to amounts actually paid plus your cost-sharing (deductibles, co-pays). Juries see both the billed amount and the paid amount. In truck accident cases with large medical bills, this change can reduce the visible damages number presented to a jury.
The Housley presumption of causation was eliminated effective May 28, 2025 under La. Code Evid. Art. 306.1. Plaintiffs must now present medical or expert testimony to prove the accident caused their injuries. Timing alone, the fact that symptoms appeared after the accident, is no longer sufficient. This increases the cost of prosecuting truck accident claims because expert witnesses are now required in cases where they previously were not.
No Pay, No Play rules changed effective August 1, 2025 under La. R.S. 32:866. If you were driving without insurance at the time of the accident, the first $100,000 in bodily injury damages is barred. The old threshold was $15,000/$25,000.
These changes collectively increase the importance of documentation, expert testimony, and early case investigation in truck accident claims. Morris & Dewett adjusted our case preparation protocols for each reform as it took effect.